General-purpose AI model obligations — transparency documentation
Documentation and transparency obligations applying to providers of general-purpose AI models placed on the EU market.
Deadlines, implementation dates and standards milestones — with the actors each one actually affects. Regulation is not a single date. It arrives in phases, and different obligations attach to different roles.
Documentation and transparency obligations applying to providers of general-purpose AI models placed on the EU market.
Harmonised standards development milestone. Conformity via harmonised standards is the practical route for most high-risk providers.
Outcome determines the timing and mechanism by which AI Act obligations take effect in Norwegian law.
Designation of national competent authorities and market surveillance responsibilities.
Risk management, data governance, technical documentation, logging, human oversight, accuracy and robustness obligations apply in full to high-risk systems.
Providers must operate post-market monitoring and report serious incidents to competent authorities.
Extended transition for AI systems that are safety components of products covered by existing EU harmonisation legislation.
A date on this calendar is not a compliance deadline for every organization. Obligations attach to the role you play for a specific system — provider, deployer, importer or distributor. The same organization can hold different roles for different systems, and can change role by modifying a system it merely deployed.