Source-grounded practice tools for AI governance professionals. Every tool links to the primary law and the AGNUS research that grounds it — not invented checklists, not vendor templates.
5 tools · no sign-up · grounded in primary sources
EU AI Act Risk Classifier
Answer 7 questions about your AI system. The classifier applies the EU AI Act's risk classification logic and tells you which tier applies, what that means, and what you need to do by when.
Question 1 of 7
Is your AI system intended to be used in any of the following applications?
Social scoring of natural persons by public authorities
Real-time biometric identification in public spaces (law enforcement)
Subliminal manipulation or exploitation of vulnerabilities
A structured checklist for high-risk AI system compliance. Every item is linked to the article of the EU AI Act it implements. Track your progress and export.
0 of 24 items complete
Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA)
Required for deployers of high-risk AI in certain contexts (EU AI Act Article 27). Complete this template to document your fundamental rights impact assessment.
Part 1 — AI System Description
Part 2 — Affected Persons and Groups
Part 3 — Fundamental Rights at Risk
Human dignity (Article 1, EU Charter)
Non-discrimination (Article 21, EU Charter)
Privacy and data protection (Articles 7–8, EU Charter)
Freedom of expression and information (Article 11)
Your obligations under the EU AI Act depend on your role. This tool identifies whether you are a provider, a deployer, or both — and lists the obligations that apply.
Question 1
Did your organisation develop or substantially modify the AI system?
Yes — we developed it from scratch, fine-tuned a foundation model, or made substantial modifications
We integrated an existing model into our product and customised it
No — we use a system developed and placed on the market by a third party
Question 2
Do you place this AI system on the market — i.e., make it available to external customers or users?
Yes — we sell, license, or provide it to other organisations or end users
No — we use it internally for our own purposes only
AI Incident Report (Article 73)
Required for providers of high-risk AI systems. Use this template to draft an incident report compliant with EU AI Act Article 73. Serious incidents involving high-risk AI must be reported to national market surveillance authorities.
Required for all providers of high-risk AI systems before placing on the market. This template covers every element of Annex IV. Complete each section and you have the foundation of your technical documentation package.
1. General description of the AI system (Annex IV §1)
2. Description of system components and development process (Annex IV §2)
7 questions. Find out exactly which risk tier applies to your AI system, what obligations follow, and what the post-Omnibus deadline is.
Start classification →3 min
Free
Compliance Checklist
24-item checklist for high-risk AI compliance. Every item linked to the article of the EU AI Act it implements. Track and export your progress.
Open checklist →15–30 min
Premium
FRIA Template
Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template per Article 27. Required for deployers of high-risk AI in public authority and similar contexts.
Open template →30–60 min
Free
Provider vs Deployer
Identify your role under the EU AI Act and the obligations that follow. Many organisations are both provider and deployer without realising it.
Self-assess →2 min
Premium
Incident Report (Art. 73)
Draft a serious incident report compliant with EU AI Act Article 73. Required for providers of high-risk AI systems when a serious incident occurs.
Open form →20–45 min
Premium
Technical Documentation (Annex IV)
Structured template per Article 11 and Annex IV. Every field maps to a specific requirement — the foundation of your high-risk AI technical documentation package.
Open template →1–3 hours
Every tool is grounded in primary sources.
Not invented checklists. Every item links to the article of law it implements and the AGNUS research that explains it.